Can
you think of an organization that has implemented a ‘high risk strategy’ that
has resulted in success (why was it high risk at the time and why was it a
success- was it good luck or good judgment)?
Answer:
There are various organizations that had implemented
a ‘high risk strategy’ which has resulted in success. One of them is the
wall-mart which is described below:
In Arkansas Sam Walton opened the first store of
wall –mart in 1962. In five years, there was the total revenue of $ 12.6
million in sales earned by 25 stores in total. Also, Wal-Mart integrated in
sustainability in international business under their CEO H Lee Scott Jr. In
2007 August Bharti enterprises and wall-mart announced an agreement to establish
Bharti wall-mart private limited. Currently there are 1800 stores and club
setting in 15 markets provide work for more than two million associates,
serving more than 176 million of client every year.
Vision and Mission.
Ø To
provide best quality products and services in very low prices, from household
items, school supplies as well as top quality groceries.
Ø To
saves the customer money and maintain them the quality of life and live them
better.
Ø To
earn a huge amount of profit also by maintaining and satisfying the consumers.
Partnerships:
Ø Engaged
in partnership with hospitals to quickly expand its store and also want the
good will a trusted hospital name can provide.
Ø To
implement sustainability in international business partnership with CRM and
environmental defense fund.
Ø Strategic
partnership with P & G and several Chinese firms which provide wall mart
sustainable business consulting.
Strategy of wall mart (which is successful):
·
To earn profit still by providing same
goods as others provides with 2-5 percent lower than competitors.
·
Operational efficiency is very high.
·
Company largest importer of Chinese
consumer goods in USA market.
·
Successful utilization of logistic &
supply chain management.
·
Worldwide expansion of business for
getting the new market opportunity.
·
Use of Information Technology in all
area of business.
·
To predict demand for optimization of
cost.
·
Bargaining power over suppliers.
Wall mart generates significant advantage through
the system it developed to run its warehouse and stores. Wall-mart prefers
locations without direct competition from large chains i.e. rural areas. It
also fashioned a culture of sustaining values, skills, technology, supplier-
customer relationships, HR and approaches to motivation which could not be
replicate or copied by the competitors.
This company also pursue the organic growth strategy
in which they construct stores in chief location with room for expansion
development and growth via standard and efficient design and standard not by
the acquisition but only 10% of space for storage.
Wall mart not only excels at attributes like price
but also on time delivery, quality, availability, selection that their
competitors cannot compete. Non-commodity, brand based on lower prices, which
is a key differentiator and value proposition to most of the world today. In
addition wall mart changes their tagline last year from ‘everyday lower price
to “save money-Live better, which also demonstrate that they move towards
sustainable products with low cost. Due to this wall-mart develop into the
leader in low cost retailing industry with revenue of $404.16 billion; also
this company is bigger than 160 nations.
Now,
do the same for an organization who embarked in a high risk strategy that
resulted in some sort of failure (why was it high risk and why did it fail –
bad luck or poor judgment)?
There are various organizations that embarked in high risk strategy that resulted in some sort of failure among them one is the British Broadcasting Corporation which is described below:
Overview of the organization
The British Broadcasting
Corporations signify a form of broadcasting which is clued-up by the attitude
of public services. It is a pioneer in broadcasting and for many years and is a
public monopoly organization. Basically, the association get on on the policy
of giving the public what they thought is good for them rather than what they
want .Today, it exists in a competitive world with its future estimate in the international
contexts.
Its home programmers and broadcasts make
fund from the levy of TV license fees and from its profit-making activities.
For the license fee of BBC to be justified, it is requisite to fabricate high
rating shows which are not usually broadcasted by the business broadcasters.
The BBC management is free from straight intervention of the government with
its actions supervised by the BBC Trust, the previous Board of Governors. The
Direct General chosen by the Trust holds the universal management of the firm.
The PEST Analysis:
This analysis in attendance is the
external factors which caused the strategic dilemmas and affected its strategic
decisions.
Political
Factors.
Ø
Government limitations on license
fee contract.
Ø
Country’s legislation on outsourcing
programme manufacture.
Ø
Preventive legislation from other regime
towards the nature of fresh media.
Ø
European Union Competition
Regulation barring the abuse of foremost position which may influence the trade
among member states
Environmental
Factors.
Ø
Geographical partition which limits right
to use to technology.
Social Factors
Social Factors
Ø
Growing consumer demand on content.
Ø
Difficulty of the poor people to
access different kind of services.
Technological
Factors
Ø
Modernism in new media variety and
channels
Ø
Media combination and Digitization.
Ø
Integration of customer policy and
devices.
Reasons
of this business failure due to high risk are as given below:
This company faced the risk of coming out as
bureaucratic and inflexible. In recent years showed that BBC to adapt a
commissioning model which makes them less of the programmer and more of the
designer of programs made by independent production house. However, these two
differs in terms of structure cultures and skills.
Among the numerous advantages of the
BBC is its inbuilt creativity. However, this necessary element has reduced and
become marginalized. Historically, the BBC is run under a bureaucratic and hierarchical
structure that is characterized by strong values surrounding the public service
ethos. However, these carry out are changed gradually. Ultimately, the BBC was portraying
to be an expensive, elitist and lacking of customer focus. This kind of
criticism led to an organizational reorganization including the approval of a
commissioning form. Throughout the few years of completion, this move has
caused the amplified loss of key talents in each the useful function areas of
the firm.
Former to the absolute adoption of
the commissioning model, the association is countenance with the dilemma of
choosing the kinds of programs it will offer to the viewers. The survivals of
competitors from around 200 channels create clear threat to the BBC. The
increasing prices for talent and broadcasting cost make it even further tricky
for the organization to remain pace with the competition.
BBC was indicting of take up market
popular programs such as those of the ITV to attract more viewers. The
popularization of the UK broadcasting business also led to smaller ground
breaking programs because they are high as well as too risky in an industry
that has turn into obsessed in ratings. Therefore, good quality program
are less probable to be created.
References:
1. Johnson, Whittington and Scholes (2011) Exploring Strategy, 9th Edition, Pearson Education, Chapter 6
2. Johnson, Whittington and Scholes (2011) Exploring Strategy, 9th Edition, Pearson Education, Chapter 11
3. http://ivythesis.typepad.com/term_paper_topics/2009/09/case-study-british-broadcasting-corporation.html#ixzz2AuIDRkjN accessed on march 30th 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment