1.
In your own words and using referenced quotes describe what is meant in
strategy by ‘Organizational Purpose’ and describe what is meant by Corporate
Social Responsibility‘
Organizational
Purpose
The ‘organizational
purpose’ is the expression or sign of needs of the organizations stakeholders
and their relative significance. The needs of stakeholders mostly varied and
habitually conflicting. Also, wants, its purpose may perhaps also reproduce
basic internal considerations, like preference of the board or organizational
code with ethics. From organizational purpose vision and mission facilitates
the essential foundation for making strategic choice. The mission, vision and
organization purpose describe what the organization needs to be consider for
the long term and short term organizational goals, objectives and success. Also
describe what the organizational needs to do in order to achieve effectiveness
and efficiency.
The definition of
organization mission and vision has much as similar with organization’s
business. It facilitates and helps to understand the markets in which
organization operates and principal behavior it competes. A critical part of
this process is the organization questioning its usual thought of what business
it is in.
Frequently expressed
“organizational Purpose” using the enlisted variables:
1.
The target beneficiary or customers of
the organizational outputs.
2.
The ethical values and norms of the
organization.
3.
The type of citizens employed by the
organization.
4.
The scope and size of the organization.
5.
Cost and Quality.
6.
Structure of the organization.
7.
Varieties of products and services
produced by the organization.
8.
The workers conditions and
relationships.
Corporate
Social Responsibility (CSR)
Corporate Social
Responsibility is referred as the managing of the overall impact of an
organization on community or society. This comprises the through or straight
impact of operation and the broad impact of the business ups and downs in value
chain, from suppliers to consumers or customers. In addition it covers the
voluntary contribution the company makes to the society and wider community.
Corporate Social Responsibility
covers the each followings element:
1.
Security and labour.
2.
Human rights.
3.
Corporate governance and Business
standard.
4.
Human disaster liberation.
5.
Promotion of education and health.
6.
Economic development and enterprise.
7.
Protection of the environment.
2.
Should organizations focus more on profit and
shareholder satisfaction or responsibility and stakeholder satisfaction?
Discuss your own thoughts but try to support your ideas with theory or examples.
I think organizations
should focus both on profit and shareholder satisfaction as well as
responsibility and stakeholder’s satisfaction because both terminologies are
essential for organizational goals and objectives. In my opinion profit and
responsibility are interlinked with each other, so I am explaining the both
shareholder or stake holder perspective.
Shareholder
value perspective
The shareholders values
highlights profitability over responsibility and perceive organization mainly
as instrument of its owners. Shareholder value proponents consider organizations
achievement can be calculated by things as dividends and economic profit share
price, and see stakeholder management rather than a means than as end in
itself. The purpose of an organization at first is to maximize shareholders
value, with what is legally permitted. By presenting market based relationships
and liberal self interest between all stakeholders and the corporation, chasing
maximum values for the shareholders will consequence in societal wealth being
maximized.
Stakeholders
value perspective
The stakeholder values
highlight responsibility over profitability and perceive organization mainly as
collations to hand out all parties involves. Stakeholder value supporter
consider an organization achievement should be considered by the satisfaction
of all the stakeholders and perceive stakeholder management as a means and end.
Due to high level of trust between all parties and strongly motivating workers
inside the organizations; pursuing mutual interest of all stakeholders is not
only more just but also maximize societal health.
Nevertheless, I feel
that she is ignoring the older groups by only targeting the young group. As we
know products is consumed by each and every age groups, so organization like PepsiCo
need to target every age groups by innovating appropriate products of food and
beverage for every age groups.
References:
3. Write about your experience with
today‘s case study. What answers did you give to the questions? What did you
think of the CEO?
What are PepsiCo’s
strategic objectives? Why does the firm exist?
As, we know each
and every organization have their own mission vision and objectives. The first
and key objective of the organization is to lead and capture market and become
the top brand which PepsiCo follows as well. PepsiCo focus more on teenagers or
young people, accordingly they are thinking and producing the products
targeting the young people. Other objective is to earn and generate $30 Billion
income by 2020. Therefore emergent strategy applied by the PepsiCo. They are producing
and trying innovating ideas in which customers’ sense composite the finest. As
we know they are concentrating Asian market after losing market in U.S.A.
Understanding Asian market is large and benefit for the products like food and
beverage. In addition PepsiCo is trying to increase the business portfolio and
hence increase the product line.
Main aim of the PepsiCo
is to lead and be top brand in food and beverage industry. Also, they are
planning to provide reward as to motivate their investors as well as
shareholders by inspiring their community, customers and workers. Furthermore,
by undertaking fair and ethical business, PepsiCo want to be authentic and finest
to their stakeholders and shareholders. PepsiCo frequently want to improve
different aspects like social, economic, environmental and cultural in which
they are operating in order to be more competitive by generating to be better
in future.
Other objectives
of PepsiCo in to provide better goods and services at affordable cost, also
functions best to the customer needs, interest and desire. For example: PepsiCo
need to take care in mind to produce more healthy food, snacks and beverage
from previous, Hence to increase the market share by planning to gain
international expansion and synergies. In addition PepsiCo wants to maintain sustainable
growth and competent in distributing system empowering workers and to be
responsive.
What are the possible strengths and benefits of the strategy?
Different possible
strength and benefits of the PepsiCo strategy are as enlisted below:
v Leading biggest
portfolio of food and beverage.
v Workers empowerment.
v Providing opportunity
to locals,
v Increase in
market share.
v Business
expansion in more than 200 nations.
v Targeting different
taste and preference according to nation wise.
v Dedicated and
experienced.
v Balanced
beverages portfolio.
v High nutritious and
balanced products.
v Increasing market
share by increasing the product line.
What are the possible weaknesses and disadvantages of the
strategy?
Different possible
weaknesses and disadvantage of the PepsiCo strategy are as enlisted below:
v Extreme competition
from rivalry (Coca-Cola).
v Not leading as a top (number one) brand in chosen
industry.
v Low preferences
from customers.
v High risk to PepsiCo.
v Less smart and
attractive packaging.
v Shareholders desire
and expectations may not be fulfilled.
v Failure in a
product line may lead customers to substitute to another similar product.
Do you think the organization has the right balance between
profitability and responsibility?
No
doubt, that the main aim of the organization is to achieve more benefits which
applies in PepsiCo as well. When, PepsiCo decline of 3% Market share per annum in
United States, concentrated more in Asian countries. However, PepsiCo must bear
in mind of creating better and innovative products also by propelled named “GOOD
FOR YOU” OR “BETTER FOR YOU” which is nutritious and quality products. It also needs
to do a lot to balance between profitability and responsibility, so that organizational
goals, mission, vision and objectives should be attained.
Charismatic
Business leadership is followed by the PepsiCo chairman and CEO named Indra
Noovi. The pettiest thing of her is to target to triple in generating revenue
by 2020, targeting to establish PepsiCo a number one brand in food and beverage
industry. She is a good leader because she is also careful about the
responsibility towards the workers, stakeholders as well as customers.
References:
1. CSR analysis (ISO 26’000), and CSR strategy development
and definition of measures,
Spar Management AG, 2009-2010
2.Lectures in social management and CSR concepts, FHNW /
Basel, ZHAW /Winterthur,
BFH / Bern ongoing, since 2003
3. Michael H. Zack, “Developing a knowledge strategy”,
California Management Review, Vol.41, No.3, Spring, 1999, pp 125-145. ?
4. Porter, M. E.
(1980) Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and
Competitors. 1 Edition. New York: The Free Press.
5. R. Nelson, “Why do firms differ and does it matter?“,
Strategic Management Journal, Winter special issue, Vol. 12, 1991, pp. 61-74.
No comments:
Post a Comment